Reviewed by the Help Dementia Editorial Team — our editors review every article for accuracy against guidance from the National Institute on Aging, the Alzheimer’s Association, and peer-reviewed sources.
Secure act sits at the center of this dementia and brain health question.
The SECURE Act has fundamentally reshaped retirement planning, but for people concerned about dementia risk, the changes cut deeper than tax efficiency—they affect whether you can protect your assets and maintain control if cognitive decline happens. The law delayed when you must start withdrawing from retirement accounts (from age 72 to 73, moving to 75 by 2033), changed how your accounts pass to heirs, and created new opportunities to shift money into tax-free Roth accounts before you lose decision-making capacity. For someone at risk of dementia—whether due to family history, early cognitive changes, or other health concerns—these changes mean you have a narrowing window to make strategic moves while you still have the clarity and legal capacity to do so.
This article covers the specific SECURE Act rules that matter most for dementia planning, how they affect you now, and what actions you should take before cognitive decline makes financial decision-making impossible. The stakes are real. Once someone with dementia loses capacity, a family member may need to pursue costly guardianship proceedings to manage their retirement accounts, or assets may sit frozen while bills pile up. The SECURE Act didn’t eliminate this risk, but it did create new strategic options if you plan early.
Table of Contents
- When Do You Need to Withdraw From Your Retirement Accounts Now?
- What Happens to Your Retirement Accounts If You Become Incapacitated?
- How to Protect Your Retirement Assets If Dementia Develops
- Should You Convert to a Roth Before Cognitive Decline?
- What About Accounts You’re Leaving to Your Children?
- How SECURE Act Changes Force Estate Plan Updates
- Planning Ahead While You Still Have Full Control
- Conclusion
When Do You Need to Withdraw From Your Retirement Accounts Now?
The most immediate change from SECURE 2.0 is the age at which required minimum distributions (RMDs) begin. If you turned 72 in 2023 or later, you don’t have to start taking RMDs until age 73—a one-year delay that gives you more time to let money grow tax-deferred. But the real shift comes after 2032: starting January 1, 2033, the RMD age rises again to 75. This phased delay is Congress’s way of acknowledging longer lifespans, but for someone with dementia in the family, it’s complicated. If you’re in your early 60s now and concerned about cognitive decline risk, that extra two years (73 instead of 72) might seem modest—but it matters enormously because it gives you two more years to make Roth conversions, set up trusts, and arrange your affairs while fully in control. The penalty for missing an RMD has also become less punishing.
It dropped from 50% of the missed amount to 25%, and if you correct the mistake within two years, it falls to 10%. This doesn’t give you license to ignore RMD rules, but it does mean an honest mistake won’t devastate your account. For someone with early cognitive problems, this softer penalty can protect you if you’re trying to manage your own accounts and forget a distribution deadline—though ideally, you’d have named someone with power of attorney to handle this before confusion sets in. One crucial exception: if you have disabilities (including mild cognitive impairment or dementia), you can withdraw money from traditional IRAs before age 59½ without the standard 10% early withdrawal penalty. You’ll still owe regular income tax on the withdrawal, but the penalty evaporates. This is designed for people whose health or circumstances force them to access retirement savings early, and it applies to dementia in many cases—though the IRS definition of “disability” has specific criteria tied to Social Security or other federal programs, so check with a tax professional before using this rule.

What Happens to Your Retirement Accounts If You Become Incapacitated?
The 10-year rule—a cornerstone of SECURE 1.0 passed in 2019—fundamentally changed how retirement accounts pass to non-spouse heirs. If you inherited a retirement account on or after January 1, 2020, or if you’re planning to leave one to your children, they must fully distribute it by the tenth anniversary of your death. No more “stretch IRAs” for most beneficiaries. For a family worried about dementia, this rule has an unexpected consequence: it compresses the tax planning timeline for your heirs. If your child inherits a $500,000 traditional IRA, they have ten years to pull it all out and pay taxes on it. That’s forcing income into their tax brackets over a compressed period instead of spreading it over decades. But here’s what matters for dementia planning: some people avoid setting up proper beneficiaries on their retirement accounts because they’re unsure about the rules or because cognitive changes make them hesitant to plan. Once you’ve lost capacity, a family member typically cannot change these beneficiaries without court involvement—and courts are slow.
There is a crucial exception for eligible designated beneficiaries: if your spouse, minor child, disabled person, chronically ill person, or someone not more than ten years younger than you inherits the account, they can still use stretch IRA strategies and ignore the 10-year rule. Disabled beneficiaries are of particular interest here. If you have a child or sibling with Down syndrome, autism, or another disability, naming them as a beneficiary means they can stretch the inherited IRA across their lifetime, leaving the rest of their government benefits intact. And importantly, if you’re the one at risk of dementia and you have a younger disabled sibling, they could be your eligible designated beneficiary—meaning the stretch IRA rules still apply to your account when they inherit it. During years one through nine after your death, some designated beneficiaries must also take annual RMDs in addition to meeting the ten-year deadline. The rules here are complicated and depend on whether the original account owner had already started RMDs. The key practical point: don’t assume your heirs will figure out the timing on their own. A professional advisor or attorney should document the distribution schedule before your death, so your family isn’t scrambling to calculate what’s required.
How to Protect Your Retirement Assets If Dementia Develops
This is where early planning becomes irreplaceable. The moment you recognize dementia risk in your family—a parent diagnosed, a concerning memory loss in yourself, genetic testing that shows increased risk—you should set up a durable financial power of attorney. This document designates someone you trust to make financial decisions on your behalf, including managing your retirement accounts. It only becomes effective if you lose capacity (or whenever you choose to activate it), and it survives your incapacity indefinitely. Without it, if you become unable to manage your own accounts, your family must petition a court for guardianship—a public, expensive process that can take months and costs $3,000–$15,000 or more. With the power of attorney already in place, they avoid all of that. A living trust serves a similar function but with additional advantages for retirement assets.
If you transfer some assets into a trust and name a successor trustee, that trustee can immediately take over management if you become incapacitated. This is especially valuable for non-retirement investment accounts and real estate, but retirement accounts themselves have special rules about trust ownership (they can cause unexpected tax problems), so work with an attorney on how to structure this. The key principle is the same: make the decision about who manages your money while you’re mentally sharp, so your wishes are clear and your family doesn’t have to guess. The timing of these documents matters enormously. Doctors and the legal system recognize cognitive capacity—and loss of it—through a medical and legal lens. If you set up a power of attorney when you’re clearly in control, it’s beyond challenge. If you wait until you’re confused, a family member (or worse, a bank or brokerage) may question whether you had capacity to sign, and you’re back to court proceedings. For someone in their 50s or 60s with dementia in the family history, setting up these documents now is not about expecting imminent decline—it’s about maximizing your autonomy if decline does happen.

Should You Convert to a Roth Before Cognitive Decline?
Roth conversions—moving money from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA and paying taxes on it—are a powerful tax strategy, but they require careful decision-making about your current and future tax brackets, income levels, and retirement timeline. If cognitive decline is a real possibility, the advantage of doing this now (while you have full mental capacity to evaluate the decision) is substantial. After conversion, your Roth grows tax-free and your heirs inherit it tax-free. No RMDs apply. For someone at dementia risk, this removes a future layer of complexity: once the money is in a Roth, future trustees or family members don’t have to scramble to understand RMD rules or worry about tax efficiency.
Starting in 2026, people ages 60–63 can make larger catch-up contributions to their employer retirement plans—up to $11,250 in 2026 (beyond the standard $7,500 age-50 catch-up). This is a new opportunity to boost retirement savings, but there’s a trap for high earners. If you earn more than $150,000 in FICA wages in 2025, your catch-up contributions in 2026 must be made as Roth (after-tax) contributions only—no pre-tax catch-up allowed. This rule aims to prevent super-wealthy people from sheltering unlimited income, but it affects middle-income business owners and high-earning professionals. For someone concerned about dementia, the implication is: if you qualify for these higher catch-ups and want to use them, do it soon and understand the tax outcome. Once you lose cognitive capacity, you can’t make these strategic contributions—and missing even one year might mean the opportunity doesn’t repeat if your income changes.
What About Accounts You’re Leaving to Your Children?
Roth 401(k)s became dramatically more attractive in 2024 when the SECURE 2.0 Act eliminated lifetime RMD requirements for them. If you have a Roth 401(k) through your employer, you no longer have to take required minimum distributions while you’re alive—unlike traditional 401(k)s. This is a significant change, especially for someone building a legacy. Your Roth 401(k) can keep growing tax-free throughout your life, and when your children inherit it, they still have the ten-year distribution rule, but they’ll inherit a larger sum because it’s been compounding without forced withdrawals. Compare this to a traditional 401(k), where you’re forced to withdraw starting at 73 (soon to be 75), creating tax bills and shrinking the account. However, Roth 401(k)s are only available if your employer sponsors them—many do, but not all. If your plan doesn’t offer them, a Roth conversion from a traditional 401(k) or IRA may be your only option.
The cost is upfront: you pay taxes on the conversion. But if you’re genuinely worried about cognitive decline making financial management impossible, the benefit of a tax-free, low-maintenance legacy might justify the tax bill. A Roth is simpler for heirs to manage because it’s not subject to mysterious RMD rules and complex tax calculations. A critical limitation: the ten-year rule still applies to inherited Roth 401(k)s unless the beneficiary is an eligible designated beneficiary. Your child still has to pull all the money out within ten years of your death. It’s better than a stretch IRA (which is now unavailable for most beneficiaries), but it’s not a permanent tax shelter for heirs. The advantage is that withdrawals from an inherited Roth are tax-free, which is a huge benefit compared to inherited traditional IRAs (where every withdrawal is taxable).

How SECURE Act Changes Force Estate Plan Updates
Many people drafted their estate plans years ago, before SECURE 2.0 passed. Their documents may still assume the old RMD ages (72), reference outdated beneficiary rules, and make no mention of Roth conversions or the ten-year rule. If you haven’t updated your estate plan since 2020, you’re almost certainly missing strategies that could save your family thousands in taxes or give you better control if dementia happens. Specifically, your estate plan should address how retirement accounts are funded, who the designated beneficiaries are, and what happens if a beneficiary (like your spouse) pre-deceases you. It should clarify whether you want trusts to inherit retirement accounts (complicated, but sometimes beneficial for control) or individuals (simpler, but less control). For someone at dementia risk, the plan should also explicitly address incapacity: who manages your accounts if you lose capacity, what decisions they can make, and whether you want Roth conversions to happen before cognitive decline.
Some families authorize their named attorney-in-fact to make Roth conversions during your incapacity, but only if the estate plan clearly allows it. There’s also a Medicaid angle. If you’re concerned about eventually needing nursing home care and Medicaid coverage, the type of retirement account you own and how it’s titled matters. Traditional IRAs are considered assets for Medicaid eligibility, while Roth IRAs have more complex treatment. Annuities in retirement accounts have special rules. An attorney specializing in elder law can advise you on whether certain moves now (like Roth conversions or annuitization) help or hurt your Medicaid planning down the road. This gets technical quickly, but the principle is simple: don’t assume retirement accounts are irrelevant to long-term care planning—they often are.
Planning Ahead While You Still Have Full Control
The most important insight from all these SECURE Act changes is that dementia planning is time-sensitive. Unlike many health conditions, dementia often develops silently. You might seem perfectly sharp and be making decisions you’d regret if you had more information, or lose capacity gradually without anyone officially documenting it. Because of this, the financially sound time to act on these strategies is now, while you’re clearly capable, rather than when you start noticing memory problems.
This doesn’t mean you need to make every decision immediately. But it does mean that if dementia runs in your family, if you’ve had any cognitive concerns, or if you’re over 60 and haven’t reviewed your retirement account beneficiaries and power of attorney, those are urgent tasks. A few hours of planning now—meeting with an estate attorney, updating your beneficiary designations, making a Roth conversion if it makes sense—could prevent months of family conflict, thousands in legal fees, and the loss of your autonomy later. The SECURE Act gave people tools (stretched RMD timelines, Roth options, higher catch-ups) to optimize retirement accounts. For someone at dementia risk, the optimization that matters most is the one that keeps you in control: planning before capacity is lost.
Conclusion
The SECURE Act reshaped retirement planning with delayed RMD ages, the ten-year inherited account rule, and new Roth opportunities—but for people concerned about dementia, the real value of these changes is tactical. They buy you time and create strategic options, but only if you use them while you’re mentally sharp. The act didn’t create a magical solution for dementia planning; it did, however, create a window of opportunity. Update your power of attorney, revisit your estate plan, clarify your retirement account beneficiaries, and consider whether Roth conversions or contributions make sense for your situation.
These moves aren’t optional fine-tuning—they’re the difference between managing your own affairs and having a family member navigate the court system on your behalf. If dementia risk runs in your family or you’re noticing concerning changes in memory or judgment, talking with an elder law attorney and a tax professional now is not paranoia—it’s pragmatism. The SECURE Act changes mean the financial landscape looks different, but the core principle hasn’t changed: the best time to plan for loss of capacity is before it happens. Make those decisions while they’re still yours to make.
You Might Also Like
- Why Women With the APOE4 Gene Have a Higher Dementia Risk Than Men With the Same Gene
- The Genetic Test for Dementia Risk That Costs $100 and Is Now Available Without a Doctor Order
- The Free Dementia Risk Calculator That Tells You Your 10 Year Risk in Under 5 Minutes
For more, see Alzheimer’s Association — caregiving.





