Many states across the United States are actively suing companies over contamination of public water supplies by PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.” These chemicals are called forever chemicals because they do not break down naturally in the environment or the human body, leading to persistent contamination and health risks. The lawsuits typically target major chemical manufacturers such as 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva, who are alleged to have knowingly produced, used, and improperly disposed of PFAS, resulting in widespread pollution of water sources.
The contamination issue has become a significant public health and environmental crisis. PFAS have been linked to serious health problems including cancer, immune system damage, thyroid disorders, developmental issues in children, and other chronic diseases. Because these chemicals accumulate in the body over time, exposure through drinking water is particularly concerning. Many states have found PFAS in their water supplies at levels exceeding safety thresholds, prompting legal action to hold polluters accountable and seek compensation for affected residents and municipalities.
For example, North Carolina has seen extensive contamination of its water resources, including from military sites and industrial sources. Residents and local governments there have filed lawsuits against companies responsible for PFAS pollution, seeking damages for health impacts and environmental cleanup. Similarly, New Jersey is one of the states with the highest levels of PFAS contamination and has been a leader in establishing enforceable drinking water standards for these chemicals. The state has also pursued legal settlements with manufacturers, including a landmark $2 billion settlement with DuPont and related companies.
In California, Santa Clara County filed a lawsuit against chemical giants like DuPont and 3M, accusing them of knowingly contaminating local drinking water with PFAS, particularly through firefighting foams used in training exercises. The lawsuit alleges that these companies concealed the dangers of PFAS exposure from workers, regulators, and the public.
The litigation landscape is vast and growing. Thousands of PFAS-related lawsuits are consolidated in federal courts, involving cities, counties, states, and individuals. Settlements have reached into the billions of dollars, reflecting the scale of contamination and the costs of remediation and health care. For instance, 3M agreed to pay hundreds of millions to resolve claims in New Jersey, and other companies have committed large sums to settle similar lawsuits nationwide.
These lawsuits are not only about financial compensation but also about forcing stricter regulations and cleanup efforts. Many states are pushing for stronger drinking water standards and better monitoring of PFAS contamination. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is movin
